Skip to main content
Redhat Developers  Logo
  • AI

    Get started with AI

    • Red Hat AI
      Accelerate the development and deployment of enterprise AI solutions.
    • AI learning hub
      Explore learning materials and tools, organized by task.
    • AI interactive demos
      Click through scenarios with Red Hat AI, including training LLMs and more.
    • AI/ML learning paths
      Expand your OpenShift AI knowledge using these learning resources.
    • AI quickstarts
      Focused AI use cases designed for fast deployment on Red Hat AI platforms.
    • No-cost AI training
      Foundational Red Hat AI training.

    Featured resources

    • OpenShift AI learning
    • Open source AI for developers
    • AI product application development
    • Open source-powered AI/ML for hybrid cloud
    • AI and Node.js cheat sheet

    Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA

    • Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA is a co-engineered, enterprise-grade AI solution for building, deploying, and managing AI at scale across hybrid cloud environments.
    • Explore the solution
  • Learn

    Self-guided

    • Documentation
      Find answers, get step-by-step guidance, and learn how to use Red Hat products.
    • Learning paths
      Explore curated walkthroughs for common development tasks.
    • Guided learning
      Receive custom learning paths powered by our AI assistant.
    • See all learning

    Hands-on

    • Developer Sandbox
      Spin up Red Hat's products and technologies without setup or configuration.
    • Interactive labs
      Learn by doing in these hands-on, browser-based experiences.
    • Interactive demos
      Click through product features in these guided tours.

    Browse by topic

    • AI/ML
    • Automation
    • Java
    • Kubernetes
    • Linux
    • See all topics

    Training & certifications

    • Courses and exams
    • Certifications
    • Skills assessments
    • Red Hat Academy
    • Learning subscription
    • Explore training
  • Build

    Get started

    • Red Hat build of Podman Desktop
      A downloadable, local development hub to experiment with our products and builds.
    • Developer Sandbox
      Spin up Red Hat's products and technologies without setup or configuration.

    Download products

    • Access product downloads to start building and testing right away.
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
    • Red Hat AI
    • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    • See all products

    Featured

    • Red Hat build of OpenJDK
    • Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    • Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
    • Red Hat Developer Toolset

    References

    • E-books
    • Documentation
    • Cheat sheets
    • Architecture center
  • Community

    Get involved

    • Events
    • Live AI events
    • Red Hat Summit
    • Red Hat Accelerators
    • Community discussions

    Follow along

    • Articles & blogs
    • Developer newsletter
    • Videos
    • Github

    Get help

    • Customer service
    • Customer support
    • Regional contacts
    • Find a partner

    Join the Red Hat Developer program

    • Download Red Hat products and project builds, access support documentation, learning content, and more.
    • Explore the benefits

Shenandoah GC in JDK 13, Part 1: Load reference barriers

June 27, 2019
Roman Kennke
Related topics:
Java

    In this series of articles, I will introduce some new developments of the Shenandoah GC coming up in JDK 13. Perhaps the most significant, although not directly user-visible, change is the switch of Shenandoah's barrier model to load reference barriers. This change resolves one major point of criticism against Shenandoah—the expensive primitive read-barriers. Here, I'll explain more about what this change means.

    Shenandoah (as well as other collectors) employs barriers to ensure heap consistency. More specifically, Shenandoah GC employs barriers to ensure what we call "to-space-invariant." This means when Shenandoah is collecting, it is copying objects from so-called "from-space" to "to-space," and it does so while Java threads are running (concurrently).

    Thus, there may be two copies of any object floating around in the JVM. To maintain heap consistency, we need to ensure either that:

    • writes happen into to-space copy + reads can happen from both copies, subject to memory model constraints = weak to-space invariant, or that
    • writes and reads always happen into/from the to-space copy = strong to-space invariant.

    The way we ensure this is by employing the corresponding type of barriers whenever reads and writes happen. Consider this pseudocode:

    void example(Foo foo) {
      Bar b1 = foo.bar;             // Read
      while (..) {
        Baz baz = b1.baz;           // Read
        b1.x = makeSomeValue(baz);  // Write
    }
    

    Employing the Shenandoah barriers, it would look like this (what the JVM+GC would do under the hood):

    void example(Foo foo) {
      Bar b1 = readBarrier(foo).bar;             // Read
      while (..) {
        Baz baz = readBarrier(b1).baz;           // Read
        X value = makeSomeValue(baz);
        writeBarrier(b1).x = readBarrier(value); // Write
    }

    In other words, wherever we read from an object, we first resolve the object via a read-barrier, and wherever we write to an object, we possibly copy the object to to-space. I won't go into the details here; let's just say that both operations are somewhat costly.

    Notice also that we need a read-barrier on the value of the write here to ensure that we only ever write to-space-references into fields while heap references get updated (another nuisance of Shenandoah's old barrier model).

    Because those barriers are a costly affair, we worked quite hard to optimize them. An important optimization is to hoist barriers out of loops. In this example, we see that b1 is defined outside the loop but only used inside the loop. We can just as well do the barriers outside the loop, once, instead of many times inside the loop:

    void example(Foo foo) {
      Bar b1 = readBarrier(foo).bar;  // Read
      Bar b1' = readBarrier(b1);
      Bar b1'' = writeBarrier(b1);
      while (..) {
        Baz baz = b1'.baz;            // Read
        X value = makeSomeValue(baz);
        b1''.x = readBarrier(value);  // Write
    }

    And, because write-barriers are stronger than read-barriers, we can fold the two up:

    void example(Foo foo) {
      Bar b1 = readBarrier(foo).bar; // Read
      Bar b1' = writeBarrier(b1);
      while (..) {
        Baz baz = b1'.baz;           // Read
        X value = makeSomeValue(baz);
        b1'.x = readBarrier(value);  // Write
    }

    This is all nice and works fairly well, but it is also troublesome, in that the optimization passes for this are very complex. The fact that both from-space and two-space-copies of any objects can float around the JVM at any time is a major source of headaches and complexity. For example, we need extra barriers for comparing objects in case we compare an object to a different copy of itself. Read-barriers and write-barriers need to be inserted for *any* read or write, including primitive reads or writes, which are very frequent.

    So, why not optimize this and strongly ensure to-space-invariance right when an object is loaded from memory? That is where load reference barriers come in. They work mostly like our previous write-barriers, but are not employed at use-sites (when reading from or storing to the object). Instead, they are used much earlier when objects are loaded (at their definition-site):

    void example(Foo foo) {
      Bar b1' = loadReferenceBarrier(foo.bar);
      while (..) {
        Baz baz = loadReferenceBarrier(b1'.baz); // Read
        X value = makeSomeValue(baz);
        b1'.x = value;                           // Write
    }

    You can see that the code is basically the same as before —after our optimizations—except that we didn't need to optimize anything yet. Also, the read-barrier for the store-value is gone, because we now know (because of the strong to-space-invariant) that whatever makeSomeValue() did, it must already have employed the load-reference-barrier if needed. The new load-reference-barrier is almost 100 percent the same as our previous write-barrier.

    The advantages of this barrier model are many (for us GC developers):

    • Strong invariant means it's a lot easier to reason about the state of GC and objects.
    • Much simpler barrier interface. In fact, a lot of stuff that we added to GC barrier interfaces after JDK11 will now become unused: no need for barriers on primitives, no need for object equality barriers, etc.
    • Optimization is much easier (see above). Barriers are naturally placed at the least-hot locations: their def-sites, instead of their most-hot locations: their use-sites, and then attempted to optimize them away from there (and not always successfully).
    • No more need for object equals barriers.
    • No more need for "resolve" barriers (a somewhat exotic kind of barriers used mostly in intrinsics and places that do read-like or write-like operations).
    • All barriers are now conditional, which opens up opportunities for further optimization later.
    • We can re-enable a bunch of optimizations, like fast JNI getters that needed to be disabled before because they did not play well with possible from-space references.

    For users, this change is mostly invisible, but the bottom line is that it improves Shenandoah's overall performance. It also opens the way for additional improvements, such as elimination of the forwarding pointer, which I'll get to in a follow-up article.

    Load reference barriers were integrated into JDK 13 development repository in April 2019. We will start backporting it to Shenandoah's JDK 11 and JDK 8 backports soon. If you don't want to wait, you can already have it: check out the Shenandoah GC Wiki for details.

    Read more

    Shenandoah GC in JDK 13, Part 2: Eliminating the forward pointer word

    Shenandoah GC in JDK 13, Part 3: Architectures and operating systems

    Last updated: July 1, 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Protect data offloaded to GPU-accelerated environments with OpenShift sandboxed containers

    • Case study: Measuring energy efficiency on the x64 platform

    • How to prevent AI inference stack silent failures

    • Preventing GPU waste: A guide to JIT checkpointing with Kubeflow Trainer on OpenShift AI

    • How to manage TLS certificates used by OpenShift GitOps operator

    Red Hat Developers logo LinkedIn YouTube Twitter Facebook

    Platforms

    • Red Hat AI
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
    • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    • See all products

    Build

    • Developer Sandbox
    • Developer tools
    • Interactive tutorials
    • API catalog

    Quicklinks

    • Learning resources
    • E-books
    • Cheat sheets
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Newsletter

    Communicate

    • About us
    • Contact sales
    • Find a partner
    • Report a website issue
    • Site status dashboard
    • Report a security problem

    RED HAT DEVELOPER

    Build here. Go anywhere.

    We serve the builders. The problem solvers who create careers with code.

    Join us if you’re a developer, software engineer, web designer, front-end designer, UX designer, computer scientist, architect, tester, product manager, project manager or team lead.

    Sign me up

    Red Hat legal and privacy links

    • About Red Hat
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Locations
    • Contact Red Hat
    • Red Hat Blog
    • Inclusion at Red Hat
    • Cool Stuff Store
    • Red Hat Summit
    © 2026 Red Hat

    Red Hat legal and privacy links

    • Privacy statement
    • Terms of use
    • All policies and guidelines
    • Digital accessibility

    Chat Support

    Please log in with your Red Hat account to access chat support.