In this post, I wanted to address how to configure mKahaDB persistence storage on ActiveMQ for better management and reducing disk usage.
Default configured KahaDB persistence adapter works well when all the destinations (queues/topics) being managed by the broker have similar performance. However, an enterprise solution where several third parties are involved is never the case.
There are multiple queues or topics and different consumers or listeners listening to these queues/topics. Some consumers might be slower than other consumers. This will grow the message store’s disk usage rapidly. Due to this situation and being single KahaDB all store destinations might perform slow.
Continue reading “Configuring mKahaDB persistence storage for ActiveMQ”
This is a transcript of a session I gave at EMEA Red Hat Tech Exchange 2017, a gathering of all Red Hat solution architects and consultants across EMEA. It is about considerations and good practices when creating images that will run on OpenShift. This fourth and last part focuses on the specific aspects of cloud-ready applications and the consequences concerning the design of the container images.
Continue reading “Container Images for OpenShift – Part 4: Cloud readiness”
This is a transcript of a session I gave at EMEA Red Hat Tech Exchange 2017, a gathering of all Red Hat solution architects and consultants across EMEA. It is about considerations and good practices when creating images that will run on OpenShift. This third part focuses on how you can make your images easier to consume by application developers or release managers.
Continue reading “Container Images for OpenShift – Part 3: Making your images consumable”
This is a transcript of a session I gave at EMEA Red Hat Tech Exchange 2017, a gathering of all Red Hat solution architects and consultants across EMEA. It is about considerations and good practices when creating images that will run on OpenShift. The content is structured in a series of four posts:
- Structuring your images
- Making your images consumable
- Cloud readiness
Continue reading “Container Images for OpenShift – Part 1: Objectives”
One of my favourite books is Antifragile by Nassim Taleb where the author talks about things that gain from disorder. Nacim introduces the concept of antifragility which is similar to hormesis in biology or creative destruction in economics and analyses it charecteristics in great details. If you find this topic interesting, there are also other authors who have examined the same phenomenon in different industries such as Gary Hamel, C. S. Holling, Jan Husdal. The concept of antifragile is the opposite of the fragile. A fragile thing such as a package of wine glasses is easily broken when dropped but an antifragile object would benefit from such stress. So rather than marking such a box with “Handle with Care”, it would be labelled “Please Mishandle” and the wine would get better with each drop (would be awesome woulnd’t it).
It didn’t take long for the concept of antifragility to be used also for describing some of the software development principles and architectural styles. Some would say that SOLID prinsiples are antifragile, some would say that microservices are antifragile, and some would say software systems cannot be antifragile ever. This article is my take on the subject.
According to Taleb, fragility, robustness, resilience and antifragility are all very different. Fragility involves loss and penalisation from disorder. Robustness is enduring to stress with no harm nor gain. Resilience involves adapting to stress and staying the same. And antifragility involves gain and benefit from disorder. If we try to relate these concepts and their characteristics to software systems, one way to define them would be as the following.
Continue reading “From Fragile to Antifragile Software”